Assyrian sacred tree
A stylised tree carved again and again in Assyrian palaces between winged figures or kings, often under the winged disc. It is no real plant; the Metropolitan Museum calls it a symbol of the fertility, abundance and prosperity of Assyria.
Meaning
The sacred tree appears throughout the palace of Ashurnasirpal II (reigned 883–859 BC) at Nimrud, with winged figures or the king on either side. The Metropolitan Museum’s curators write that it is no real plant and that its form varies within Neo-Assyrian art; it is generally thought to be a symbol of agricultural fertility and abundance, and probably of the prosperity of Assyria as a whole. Winged figures flank it, holding a bucket and a cone. One suggestion is that they are pollinating it, because the cone looks like the male date spathe that farmers used, with water, to fertilise date palms; but the Assyrians called the cone a “purifier”, and the same figures flank the king, so a protective meaning is likely too. Even the name is a choice. No Assyrian text found so far mentions it, Mariana Giovino writes in her history of the debate, so scholars have not agreed on what it shows, and they call it the “sacred tree”, the “stylized tree”, the “Assyrian tree” or the “tree of life” according to their theory.
Origin and history
In 1937 Hélène Danthine surveyed plant and tree forms in Near Eastern art from the fourth to the first millennium BC to show how the Assyrian tree grew out of earlier floral designs, Giovino records. At Nimrud, the Met notes, sacred trees were placed at the corners of many rooms, because corners, like doorways, were thought to be weak points where demons could get in; protective figurines were buried at the same spots. The reliefs were brightly painted, though almost none of the pigment survives.
Layard, in 1849, called it “the symbolical tree”: on one slab two kings faced each other across it, with the emblem of the supreme deity, the winged disc, above. That panel stood behind the king’s throne. Giovino describes its tree as a ‘palmette’ on a pole inside a ruff of other palmettes, with humans and genies on either side who appear to be anointing it.
Is it a tree of life?
No Assyrian text calls it one, and few scholars have said so since the late nineteenth century. Mariana Giovino, whose 2007 book traces the debate from Layard onwards, finds three main readings: the tree of life known from Genesis, a stylised date palm, and a cult object that people made. The date palm has led since 1890, when E. B. Tylor proposed that the winged figures were fertilising it, and the Met’s reading follows that line: an emblem of fertility and of the prosperity of Assyria, so that the winged figures who protect the tree and the king are protecting the Assyrian state. Giovino argues for the cult object.
The tree of life came back in 1993, when Simo Parpola, an Assyriologist at the University of Helsinki, published “The Assyrian Tree of Life: Tracing the Origins of Jewish Monotheism and Greek Philosophy”, an article that, Giovino writes, surprised many of his colleagues. Parpola took the throne-room tree as the model for the Sefirotic Tree of Jewish Kabbalah. Working backwards from medieval mystical writings, he read it as a mystical diagram of the divine world order which was also an image of god and of the ideal man, so that the king could be shown as the “Perfect Man”. His ideas have met with opposition in the field, Giovino records, and she points to Jerrold Cooper’s critique in the Journal of the American Oriental Society (2000) and to Barbara Nevling Porter’s study of the iconographic evidence (2003). His opponents call his views “eccentric”, yet the 1993 article has made its way into the footnotes of mainstream work on the tree. Seth Richardson, who proposed that the tree stands for all the dead kings of the Assyrian King List, set his reading against Parpola’s: the image renews kingship, he wrote, without dismissing nature for “a schematized theological representation (as Parpola would have it)”. For the wider family of world trees, see the tree of life.
The winged figures beside it
The figures who tend the tree are not great gods. The Met describes them as part of the crowd of supernatural beings that animated every part of the world for ancient Mesopotamians, eagle-headed or human-headed, wearing horned crowns and usually winged. Because they look like figurines buried under doorways whose names are known from ritual texts, they have been identified as apkallu, the sages of the distant past; the Met’s curator Sarah Graff describes the apkallu as the seven sages who lived before the flood in the land of sweet waters. Reliefs from the palace are in the Metropolitan Museum’s Assyrian Sculpture Court. Others stood in the Northwest Palace at Nimrud until its deliberate destruction, which the Met describes as including explosives and heavy earth-moving machinery.
Read next
- Next in Mesopotamian symbols and godsAnunnaki (Anunna)The Anunna, Anunnaki in Akkadian, were a group of gods in ancient Mesopotamia: in Sumerian texts the highest gods of the pantheon, or the gods of one city, who decided fates, and in later texts the gods of the underworld. Their name most likely means “those of princely seed”.
- Parpola called it the Assyrian Tree of Life; many scholars prefer “sacred tree”Tree of lifeA tree whose fruit gives life without end. In Genesis it grows in the middle of the Garden of Eden beside the tree of knowledge; Jews call the Torah a tree of life, Kabbalists draw the ten sefirot as one, and Norse myth has its own world tree.
See also
Lamassu, Assyrian winged disc, Cuneiform, Inanna (Ishtar), Star of Ishtar, Enki (Ea).
Sources
- Relief panel, Northwest Palace of Ashurnasirpal II (The Met, 322491), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, relief panel from the Northwest Palace at Nimrud, catalogue entry, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, page text
- The Assyrian Sculpture Court (The Met, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, essay “The Assyrian Sculpture Court”, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, page text
- Nimrud (The Met, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, essay “Nimrud”, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, page text
- Spotlight: Keeping culture alive (The Met, 2022), The Met, Perspectives, “Spotlight: Keeping Culture Alive”, August 2022: Sarah Graff (associate curator, Ancient Near Eastern Art) and Sargon Donabed (Roger Williams University), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, page text
- Nineveh and its Remains, vol. 1 (Austen Henry Layard, 1849), Austen Henry Layard, Nineveh and its Remains, vol. I (London: John Murray, 1849), ch. III pp. 65–66 and ch. V p. 133, Internet Archive (out-of-copyright scan), page text
- The Assyrian Sacred Tree: A History of Interpretations (Mariana Giovino, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 230, 2007), Mariana Giovino, The Assyrian Sacred Tree: A History of Interpretations, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 230 (Fribourg and Göttingen, 2007), pp. 84 and n. 215, 124 and n. 329 (quoting W. H. Ward, 1910, and S. Richardson, State Archives of Assyria Bulletin 13), Academic Press Fribourg / Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (open access, University of Zurich ZORA), abstract; pp. 1, 5, 19–20, 124–126
The same shape elsewhere
Browse symbols formed from circles or lines.
Researched, edited and approved by Rory Hansen before publishing. Last reviewed October 8, 2026. How we research
Added .